The article discusses how the language used in sport science can reinforce dominant norms and marginalize certain groups. It suggests that the language in this field is often homogenous, uncritical, and rooted in Western, colonial, and binary perspectives, which can limit our understanding and engagement with the complexities of human experiences in sports. The authors argue that language is not neutral and plays a crucial role in shaping our perceptions, assumptions, and communication, ultimately impacting the scientific validity and inclusiveness of sport science research.